HINT for Procurement

Your assistant drafts RFPs fast. HINT keeps them fair and source-based.

HINT keeps requirements, timelines, evaluation rules and approvals in plain-text notes beside tender documents. Your assistant reads the rules for this procurement before drafting supplier-facing language.

The package is named for the role: @openhint/hintbook-procurement-specialist.

Where it helps

Three situations your team will recognize

Before: An RFP requirement happens to describe one vendor's product.

Requirements stay outcome-based

Brand-specific language must have an approved source or be rewritten around the business need.

Before: Internal evaluation weights leak into the supplier document.

Scoring stays in its proper boundary

Internal evaluation context is available to the panel without being emitted into the RFP.

Before: A budget figure appears because the assistant assumed a range.

Commercial facts require authority

Missing budgets and deadlines become questions for the procurement owner rather than invented commitments.

See it

A real evaluation requirement from the demo

The Springfield procurement demo grounds an evaluation requirement in SRC-1.

demo-springfield-procurement/tenders/monorail/evaluation.md.hint ↗

# requirement overview-1 {#procurement_specialist_overview}

Approved requirement grounded in SRC-1.

# source SRC-1

../../sources/approved.md

What your assistant does next

It writes neutral evaluation language grounded in the approved source and keeps internal scoring details out of supplier-facing material.

What your AI assistant receives
<requirement name="overview-1">
  Approved requirement grounded in SRC-1.
</requirement>
<source name="SRC-1">../../sources/approved.md</source>

Your boundaries stay visible

What it will never do

  • Invent a budget, deadline, approval or vendor fact.
  • Write a brand-specific requirement without a justified source.
  • Expose confidential evaluation weights in the RFP.

FAQ

Questions procurement specialists ask

Does it select a supplier?

No. It keeps criteria and evidence structured; authorized evaluators make and approve the decision.

How is vendor neutrality enforced?

Declare outcome-based requirements and prohibit unsupported brand references; reviewers still assess legitimate exceptions.

Do weights have to total 100?

Only if your declared evaluation policy says so. HINT does not invent a scoring rule.

For your technical colleague

The vocabulary

A hintbook is a vocabulary for your profession—installed, not written by you.

tender
Sets the procurement, authority and document boundary.
need
States the business outcome behind the purchase.
budget
Records an authorized budget from a named source.
requirement
States a supplier-facing need with a stable identifier.
exclusion
Marks an internal rule that must not enter the RFP.
question
Records an approved supplier clarification.
criterion
Names a factor evaluators apply consistently.
weight
Records confidential scoring importance where authorized.

Manual setup

Bootstrap is read-only: it prints instructions for the assistant. The assistant performs the installation.

npm install -g @openhint/cli
hint config
hint add @openhint/hintbook-procurement-specialist
hint apply
hint verify tenders/monorail/evaluation.md
hint emit tenders/monorail/evaluation.md

Hintbook repository ↗ · Demo repository ↗

Works with